Dyke; Peter John
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Dyke; Peter John.The latest application filed is for "optical fibre ducting system".
- Dyke; Peter John - Widdington GB
- Dyke; Peter John - Saffron Walden GB
- Dyke; Peter John - Saffron Waldon GB
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Optical fibre ducting system Grant 6,427,042 - Dyke , et al. July 30, 2 | 2002-07-30 |
| Providing digital services to telephone subscribers Grant 6,359,906 - Dyke , et al. March 19, 2 | 2002-03-19 |
| Passive optical network arrangement Grant 6,351,582 - Dyke , et al. February 26, 2 | 2002-02-26 |
| Communication system architecture, infrastructure exchange and method of operation Grant 6,262,991 - Dyke , et al. July 17, 2 | 2001-07-17 |
| Communication system architecture, exchange having a plurality of broadband modems and method of supporting broadband operation on a one to one basis Grant 6,148,006 - Dyke , et al. November 14, 2 | 2000-11-14 |
| Cabinet with enhanced convection cooling Grant 6,088,225 - Parry , et al. July 11, 2 | 2000-07-11 |
| Method and apparatus for reducing cross-talk in broadband systems using line-coding Grant 6,069,922 - Dyke May 30, 2 | 2000-05-30 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 