loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Durrill; Steven R..The latest application filed is for "method and apparatus to drive layout of arbitrary em-coil through parametrized cell".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Method and apparatus to drive layout of arbitrary EM-coil through parametrized cell Grant 10,285,276 - Kukal , et al. | 2019-05-07 |
Methods, systems, and computer program product for implementing a layout-driven, multi-fabric schematic design Grant 9,934,354 - Kukal , et al. April 3, 2 | 2018-04-03 |
Methods, systems, and computer program product for constructing a simulation schematic of an electronic design across multiple design fabrics Grant 9,881,119 - Kukal , et al. January 30, 2 | 2018-01-30 |
Method and apparatus for concurrent design of modules across different design entry tools targeted to single simulation Grant 8,521,483 - Kukal , et al. August 27, 2 | 2013-08-27 |
Hierarchical editing of printed circuit board pin assignment Grant 8,438,524 - Kohli , et al. May 7, 2 | 2013-05-07 |
Method and apparatus for concurrent design of modules across different design entry tools targeted to a single layout Grant 8,316,342 - Kukal , et al. November 20, 2 | 2012-11-20 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.