Duggal; Chanderpreet
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Duggal; Chanderpreet.The latest application filed is for "method, system, and computer program product for customer-level data verification".
- Duggal; Chanderpreet - Phoenix AZ
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Method, system, and computer program product for customer-level data verification Grant 9,892,389 - Domenica , et al. February 13, 2 | 2018-02-13 |
| Method, System, And Computer Program Product For Customer-level Data Verification App 20160148176 - Domenica; Danielle R. ; et al. | 2016-05-26 |
| Method, system, and computer program product for customer-level data verification Grant 9,195,985 - Domenica , et al. November 24, 2 | 2015-11-24 |
| Method, System, and Computer Program Product for Customer-Level Data Verification App 20080314977 - Domenica; Danielle R. ; et al. | 2008-12-25 |
| Method, system, and computer program product for customer-level data verification App 20070284433 - Domenica; Danielle R. ; et al. | 2007-12-13 |
| System, method and computer program product for authorizing transactions using enhanced authorization data App 20070192249 - Biffle; Janet L. ; et al. | 2007-08-16 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 