Bailey, Robert
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Bailey, Robert. Bailey, Robert has 1 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "HANGUPS"
- Company Aliases
- Driscoll, Kevin
- kevin driscoll
- Driscoll, Kevin - Maple Grove MN
- Driscoll; Kevin - Maple Grove MN
| Entity Type | INDIVIDUAL |
| Address | 1/10 William Street Munna Point, Queensland AUSTRALIA 4566 |
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| Pseudo random verification of waveform fault coverage 20050149789 - 10/993398 Driscoll, Kevin | 2005-07-07 |
| Priority based arbitration for TDMA schedule enforcement in a multi-channel system 7,907,628 - 10/993,926 Hall , et al. March 15, 2 | 2011-03-15 |
| Port driven authentication in a network 7,668,204 - 10/993,164 Hall , et al. February 23, 2 | 2010-02-23 |
| High integrity data propagation in a braided ring 7,606,179 - 10/993,933 Hall , et al. October 20, 2 | 2009-10-20 |
| Mobius time-triggered communication 7,246,186 - 10/993,923 Hall , et al. July 17, 2 | 2007-07-17 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"HANGUPS" 76427966 |
HANGUPS 2002-07-08 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 