Driscoll; Elizabeth J.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Driscoll; Elizabeth J..The latest application filed is for "duplex clip for clipping two optical fiber simplex connectors together to form a duplex connector".
- Driscoll; Elizabeth J. - Atlanta GA
- Driscoll; Elizabeth J. - Dekalb County GA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Duplex clip for clipping two optical fiber simplex connectors together to form a duplex connector Grant 6,409,392 - Lampert , et al. June 25, 2 | 2002-06-25 |
| Optical fiber boot for a connector that provides anti-snagging and polarity identification Grant 6,357,934 - Driscoll , et al. March 19, 2 | 2002-03-19 |
| Optical fiber connector for backplane Grant 6,318,903 - Andrews , et al. November 20, 2 | 2001-11-20 |
| Device that attaches to the boot of an optical fiber simplex connector to provide the connector with anti-snagging and/or polarity identification features Grant 6,250,817 - Lampert , et al. June 26, 2 | 2001-06-26 |
| Optical connector having a one-piece housing Grant 6,206,581 - Driscoll , et al. March 27, 2 | 2001-03-27 |
| Unipartite jack receptacle Grant 5,647,043 - Anderson , et al. July 8, 1 | 1997-07-08 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 