loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Draudt; Gregg.The latest application filed is for "programmable adaptable touch screen elevator devices".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Elevator hall call system including a programmable adaptable touch screen Grant 8,136,636 - Bahjat , et al. March 20, 2 | 2012-03-20 |
Programmable Adaptable Touch Screen Elevator Devices App 20090294221 - Bahjat; Zuhair ;   et al. | 2009-12-03 |
Chuck with internal nut Grant 7,455,303 - Draudt , et al. November 25, 2 | 2008-11-25 |
Shredder Grant D556,250 - Kent , et al. November 27, 2 | 2007-11-27 |
Shredder device Grant D547,366 - Kent , et al. July 24, 2 | 2007-07-24 |
Shredder device Grant D546,872 - Kent , et al. July 17, 2 | 2007-07-17 |
Chuck with internal nut App 20070052183 - Draudt; Gregg ;   et al. | 2007-03-08 |
Chuck Grant D520,324 - Yaksich , et al. May 9, 2 | 2006-05-09 |
Remote Control For Electronic Whiteboard App 20040246236 - Hildebrandt, Peter ;   et al. | 2004-12-09 |
Piston-type passenger conveying system Grant 6,520,295 - Sansevero , et al. February 18, 2 | 2003-02-18 |
Rotatable elevator system Grant 6,354,404 - Sansevero , et al. March 12, 2 | 2002-03-12 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.