Doll; Kevin
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Doll; Kevin.The latest application filed is for "sensor trigger".
- Doll; Kevin - Mason OH
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Gastric restriction device data handling devices and methods Grant 8,591,395 - Ortiz , et al. November 26, 2 | 2013-11-26 |
| Methods for implanting a gastric restriction device Grant 8,187,163 - Ortiz , et al. May 29, 2 | 2012-05-29 |
| Gastric Restriction Device Data Handling Devices And Methods App 20090192415 - Ortiz; Mark S. ; et al. | 2009-07-30 |
| Sensor Trigger App 20090192534 - Ortiz; Mark S. ; et al. | 2009-07-30 |
| Methods For Implanting A Gastric Restriction Device App 20090149874 - Ortiz; Mark S. ; et al. | 2009-06-11 |
| Surgical stapling instrument having a single lockout mechanism for prevention of firing Grant 7,380,695 - Doll , et al. June 3, 2 | 2008-06-03 |
| Surgical Stapling Instrument Having An Electroactive Polymer Actuated Single Lockout Mechanism For Prevention Of Firing App 20070084896 - Doll; Kevin ; et al. | 2007-04-19 |
| Surgical stapling instrument having a single lockout mechanism for prevention of firing App 20050023324 - Doll, Kevin ; et al. | 2005-02-03 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 