Dinh Van
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Dinh Van. Dinh Van has 4 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "SPIRALE"
- Company Aliases
- DINH VAN
- van dinh
- Dinh; Van - Irvine CA
- Dinh Van - Paris FR
- DINH VAN - Paris N/A FR
- Van; Dinh - Paris N/A FR
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| EMULSION FORMULATIONS OF MULTIKINASE INHIBITORS 20220040103 - 17/509774 Ni; Jinsong ; et al. | 2022-02-10 |
| EMULSION FORMULATIONS OF MULTIKINASE INHIBITORS 20210315815 - 17/272105 Ni; Jinsong ; et al. | 2021-10-14 |
| Finger ring D934,106 - D/707,444 de Laage October 26, 2 | 2021-10-26 |
| Finger ring D934,106 - D/707,444 de Laage October 26, 2 | 2021-10-26 |
| Bracelet D878,951 - 35/505,516 Laage | 2020-03-24 |
| Bracelet D525,553 - D/230,657 Toupet July 25, 2 | 2006-07-25 |
| Wrist-watch D453,005 - D/131,555 Baumer January 22, 2 | 2002-01-22 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"SPIRALE" 5184012 79188857 |
SPIRALE 2016-04-12 |
"PI" 79130221 |
PI 2013-03-05 |
"PI" 3142330 79009471 |
PI 2005-02-02 |
"DINH VAN" 2420828 75751873 |
DINH VAN 1999-07-14 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 