DigiCourse, Inc.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for DigiCourse, Inc..The latest application filed is for "apparatus and method for determining azimuth, pitch and roll".
- DigiCourse, Inc. - Harahan LA
- Digicourse, Inc. - Hanrahan LA
- Digicourse Inc. - New Orleans LA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Apparatus and method for determining azimuth, pitch and roll Grant 5,105,548 - Fowler * April 21, 1 | 1992-04-21 |
| Apparatus and method for determining azimuth, pitch and roll Grant 5,010,653 - Fowler April 30, 1 | 1991-04-30 |
| Seismic streamer communication system Grant 4,912,684 - Fowler March 27, 1 | 1990-03-27 |
| Method of calibrating a compass heading Grant 4,843,865 - Fowler July 4, 1 | 1989-07-04 |
| Controlled reflection readout for displays Grant 4,235,523 - Lapeyre * November 25, 1 | 1980-11-25 |
| Alphanumeric display system Grant 4,112,424 - Lapeyre * September 5, 1 | 1978-09-05 |
| Controlled reflection readout for digital displays Grant 4,032,222 - Lapeyre June 28, 1 | 1977-06-28 |
| Alphanumeric display system Grant RE29,033 - Lapeyre November 9, 1 | 1976-11-09 |
| NCAGE Code | 2N737 | DIGICOURSE INC |
| CAGE Code | 2N737 | DIGICOURSE INC |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 