Trademark applications and grants for Diffrient Niels. Diffrient Niels has 1 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "DIFFRIENT"
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
Chair With Articulating Backrest 20170354254 - 15/619183 Diffrient; Niels ;   et al. | 2017-12-14 |
Seating Apparatus With Reclining Movement 20120146377 - 13/403808 Diffrient; Niels | 2012-06-14 |
Movable Arm Pad 20120145840 - 13/361834 Diffrient; Niels ;   et al. | 2012-06-14 |
Adjustable Armrest 20110084535 - 12/579198 Diffrient; Niels | 2011-04-14 |
Seating Apparatus With Reclining Movement 20090152930 - 12/390620 Diffrient; Niels | 2009-06-18 |
Chair D864,603 - D/634,825 Diffrient , et al. Oc | 2019-10-29 |
Chair with articulating backrest 10,299,595 - 15/619,183 Diffrient , et al. | 2019-05-28 |
Ottoman support D808,699 - D/567,413 Diffrient , et al. January 30, 2 | 2018-01-30 |
Chair back D795,622 - D/567,412 Diffrient , et al. August 29, 2 | 2017-08-29 |
Movable arm pad 8,840,188 - 13/361,834 Diffrient , et al. September 23, 2 | 2014-09-23 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
![]() "DIFFRIENT" 3953172 77846469 |
DIFFRIENT 2009-10-12 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.