loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Dieumegard; Dominique.The latest application filed is for "optically controlled cold-cathode electron tube".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Optically controlled cold-cathode electron tube Grant 8,427,039 - Legagneux , et al. April 23, 2 | 2013-04-23 |
Field-emission cathode, with optical control Grant 8,035,295 - Legagneux , et al. October 11, 2 | 2011-10-11 |
Optically Controlled Cold-cathode Electron Tube App 20100072872 - Legagneux; Pierre ;   et al. | 2010-03-25 |
Field-emission Cathode, With Optical Control App 20090261727 - Legagneux; Pierre ;   et al. | 2009-10-22 |
Method for the fabrication of field emission type sources, and application thereof to the making of arrays of emitters Grant 5,090,932 - Dieumegard , et al. February 25, 1 | 1992-02-25 |
Device made of oxide superconductive material covered with ion conductive means for adjusting the doping level and T.sub.c thereof Grant 5,053,833 - Pribat , et al. October 1, 1 | 1991-10-01 |
Process for manufacturing a semi-conductor device of the type comprising at least one silicon layer deposited on an insulating substrate Grant 4,540,452 - Croset , et al. September 10, 1 | 1985-09-10 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.