loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Diehl; Matthew D..The latest application filed is for "decoupling assembly for a plumbing network".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Decoupling assembly for a plumbing network Grant 9,851,188 - Diehl , et al. December 26, 2 | 2017-12-26 |
Pressure vessel with safety features Grant 08919254 - | 2014-12-30 |
Pressure vessel with safety features Grant 8,919,254 - Diehl , et al. December 30, 2 | 2014-12-30 |
Decoupling Assembly for a Plumbing Network App 20140306443 - Diehl; Matthew D. ;   et al. | 2014-10-16 |
Pressure Vessel With Safety Features App 20140284913 - Diehl; Matthew D. ;   et al. | 2014-09-25 |
Capacitive reactive armor assembly Grant 8,807,009 - Diehl August 19, 2 | 2014-08-19 |
Rocket motor tube with safety features Grant 8,578,855 - Diehl , et al. November 12, 2 | 2013-11-12 |
Capacitive Reactive Armor Assembly App 20130087038 - Diehl; Matthew D. | 2013-04-11 |
Rocket Motor Tube With Safety Features App 20110044751 - DIEHL; Matthew D. ;   et al. | 2011-02-24 |
Laser dazzler matrix Grant 7,040,780 - Diehl May 9, 2 | 2006-05-09 |
Laser dazzler matrix App 20050185403 - Diehl, Matthew D. | 2005-08-25 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.