loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Diehl & Eagle Picher GmbH.The latest application filed is for "activation mechanism for a battery for an electronic ignition mechanism and a battery".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Activation mechanism for a battery for an electronic ignition mechanism and a battery Grant 11,335,915 - Hein May 17, 2 | 2022-05-17 |
Activation device for a battery for an electronic ignition mechanism and battery Grant 11,302,930 - Hein April 12, 2 | 2022-04-12 |
Activation Mechanism For A Battery For An Electronic Ignition Mechanism And A Battery App 20200395620 - HEIN; ROLAND | 2020-12-17 |
Activatable Battery, Electronic Igniter, Process For Producing An Activatable Battery And Method Of Using An Unsupported Film In A Battery App 20200321631 - HEIN; ROLAND | 2020-10-08 |
Activation Device For A Battery For An Electronic Ignition Mechanism And Battery App 20200006785 - HEIN; ROLAND | 2020-01-02 |
Missile Fuse And Method Of Supplying Electrical Energy To The Missile Fuse App 20160169650 - WICH; HARALD ;   et al. | 2016-06-16 |
NCAGE Code | C3681 | DIEHL & EAGLE-PICHER GMBH |
CAGE Code | C3681 | DIEHL & EAGLE-PICHER GMBH |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.