Di Domenico; Edward
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Di Domenico; Edward.The latest application filed is for "plasma process for surface modification of pyrolitic carbon".
- Di Domenico; Edward - Anoka MN
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Plasma process for surface modification of pyrolitic carbon Grant 6,372,283 - Shim , et al. April 16, 2 | 2002-04-16 |
| Implantable medical device having flat electrolytic capacitor with connector block and sealed feedthroughs Grant 6,212,063 - Johnson , et al. April 3, 2 | 2001-04-03 |
| Plasma process for reducing friction within the lumen of polymeric tubing Grant 5,830,329 - Stewart , et al. November 3, 1 | 1998-11-03 |
| Plasma process for reducing friction within the lumen of polymeric tubing Grant 5,693,196 - Stewart , et al. December 2, 1 | 1997-12-02 |
| Plasma process for reducing friction within the lumen of polymeric tubing Grant 5,593,550 - Stewart , et al. January 14, 1 | 1997-01-14 |
| Silicon insulated extendable/retractable screw-in pacing lead with high efficiency torque transfer Grant 5,476,501 - Stewart , et al. December 19, 1 | 1995-12-19 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 