DeVito; Ashley
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for DeVito; Ashley.The latest application filed is for "rotation of disengaged rotor".
- DeVito; Ashley - Newtown CT
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| AFT exhaust system for rotary wing aircraft Grant 10,562,641 - Pantalone, III , et al. Feb | 2020-02-18 |
| Rotation of disengaged rotor Grant 10,549,852 - Devito , et al. Fe | 2020-02-04 |
| Upturned exhaust system for rotary wing aircraft Grant 10,273,018 - Pantalone, III , et al. | 2019-04-30 |
| Rotation Of Disengaged Rotor App 20170190417 - Devito; Ashley ; et al. | 2017-07-06 |
| Rotary wing aircraft having collocated exhaust duct and propeller shaft Grant 9,297,290 - Pantalone, III , et al. March 29, 2 | 2016-03-29 |
| Aft Exhaust System For Rotary Wing Aircraft App 20140215999 - Pantalone, III; Joseph ; et al. | 2014-08-07 |
| Rotary Wing Aircraft Having Collocated Exhaust Duct And Propeller Shaft App 20140217231 - Pantalone, III; Joseph ; et al. | 2014-08-07 |
| Upturned Exhaust System For Rotary Wing Aircraft App 20140096501 - Pantalone, III; Joseph ; et al. | 2014-04-10 |
| Rotary wing aircraft Grant D665,720 - Stille , et al. August 21, 2 | 2012-08-21 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 