DeFrank; Edmond Arthur
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for DeFrank; Edmond Arthur.The latest application filed is for "pupillary response feedback eyewear".
- DeFrank; Edmond Arthur - Northridge CA
- DeFrank; Edmond Arthur - US
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Pupillary Response Feedback Eyewear App 20220308366 - Hart; William ; et al. | 2022-09-29 |
| Pupillary response feedback eyewear Grant 11,347,084 - Hart , et al. May 31, 2 | 2022-05-31 |
| Pupillary Response Feedback Eyewear App 20210041725 - Hart; William ; et al. | 2021-02-11 |
| Prescription drug management program accountability method and system App 20180174673 - DeFrank; Edmond Arthur ; et al. | 2018-06-21 |
| Pupillary Response Feedback Eyewear App 20170307907 - Hart; William ; et al. | 2017-10-26 |
| Eyewear pupilometer Grant 9,720,259 - Hart , et al. August 1, 2 | 2017-08-01 |
| Eyewear Pupilometer App 20160103338 - Hart; William ; et al. | 2016-04-14 |
| Prescription Smart Label System App 20140188502 - Defrank; Edmond Arthur ; et al. | 2014-07-03 |
| Method Of Automated Electronic Health Record System App 20140188508 - DeFrank; Edmond Arthur | 2014-07-03 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 