loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Deepwater Technologies, Inc..The latest application filed is for "bottom tensioned offshore oil well production riser".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Bottom tensioned offshore oil well production riser Grant 7,063,158 - Horton, III June 20, 2 | 2006-06-20 |
Offshore platform stabilizing strakes Grant 6,953,308 - Horton October 11, 2 | 2005-10-11 |
Semi-submersible multicolumn floating offshore platform Grant 6,935,810 - Horton, III August 30, 2 | 2005-08-30 |
Multi-cellular floating platform with central riser buoy Grant 6,884,003 - Horton, III April 26, 2 | 2005-04-26 |
Vertically restrained centerwell SPAR Grant 6,854,933 - Horton, III February 15, 2 | 2005-02-15 |
Bottom tensioned offshore oil well production riser App 20040251029 - Horton, Edward E. III | 2004-12-16 |
Production riser with pre-formed curves for accommodating vessel motion App 20040244985 - Horton, Edward E. III | 2004-12-09 |
Cellular spar apparatus and method Grant 6,817,309 - Horton November 16, 2 | 2004-11-16 |
Offshore well production riser App 20040163817 - Horton, Edward E. III | 2004-08-26 |
Work module support vessel Grant 6,676,334 - Horton, III January 13, 2 | 2004-01-13 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.