Day; David E.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Day; David E..The latest application filed is for "polyester-polyether hybrid urethane acrylate oligomer for uv curing pressure sensitive adhesives".
- Day; David E. - Columbus OH
- Day; David E. - Milford OH
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Polyester-polyether hybrid urethane acrylate oligomer for UV curing pressure sensitive adhesives Grant 7,166,649 - Day , et al. January 23, 2 | 2007-01-23 |
| Polyester-polyether hybrid urethane acrylate oligomer for UV curing pressure sensitive adhesives App 20050239916 - Day, David E. ; et al. | 2005-10-27 |
| Heat and radio frequency-curable two-pack soy protein-based polyurethane adhesive compositions Grant 6,365,650 - Chen , et al. April 2, 2 | 2002-04-02 |
| Heat and radio frequency-curable two-pack soy protein-based polyurethane adhesive compositions App 20020031669 - Chen, Gang-Fung ; et al. | 2002-03-14 |
| Heat and radio frequency-curable two-pack soy protein-based polyurethane adhesive compositions Grant 6,231,985 - Chen , et al. May 15, 2 | 2001-05-15 |
| Self-aligning eddy current probe holder Grant 6,175,234 - Granger, Jr. , et al. January 16, 2 | 2001-01-16 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 