Das; Pratap K.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Das; Pratap K..The latest application filed is for "pharmaceutical composition useful for the treatment of peptic ulcer diseases".
- Das; Pratap K. - Jadavpur N/A IN
- Das; Pratap K. - Kolkata IN
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Pharmaceutical composition useful for the treatment of peptic ulcer diseases Grant 8,383,690 - Banerjee , et al. February 26, 2 | 2013-02-26 |
| Pharmaceutical Composition Useful For The Treatment Of Peptic Ulcer Diseases App 20110207682 - Banerjee; Sukdeb ; et al. | 2011-08-25 |
| Pharmaceutical composition useful for the treatment of peptic ulcer diseases App 20080274985 - Banerjee; Sukdeb ; et al. | 2008-11-06 |
| Anti-peptic ulcer activity of an extract of a flower of Woodfordia fruticosa Grant 7,291,353 - Das , et al. November 6, 2 | 2007-11-06 |
| Anti peptic ulcer activity of an extract of a plant flower woodfordia fruticosa App 20060040005 - Das; Pratap K. ; et al. | 2006-02-23 |
| Anti peptic ulcer activity of an extract of a plant flower woodfordia fruticosa App 20040022875 - Das, Pratap K. ; et al. | 2004-02-05 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 