Dany; Franz-Josef

Patent Applications and Registrations

Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Dany; Franz-Josef.The latest application filed is for "process for the preparation of a dicalcium phosphate dihydrate suitable for use in toothpastes".

Company Profile

0.22.0

Dany; Franz-Josef - Erftstadt DE
Dany; Franz-Josef - Erftstadt Lechenich DE
Dany; Franz-Josef - Erfstadt Lechenich DT
Dany; Franz-Josef - Lechenich DT

*profile and listings may contain filings by different individuals or companies with the same name. Review application materials to confirm ownership/assignment.

Patent Activity

Patent	Date
Process for the preparation of a dicalcium phosphate dihydrate suitable for use in toothpastes Grant 5,427,755 - Dany , et al. June 27, 1	1995-06-27
Detergent containing sodium disilicate having a water content of 0.3 to 6% by weight Grant 5,096,609 - Dany , et al. March 17, 1	1992-03-17
Washing agent with storage-stabilized bleach system Grant 5,078,895 - Dany , et al. January 7, 1	1992-01-07
Dishwashing agent Grant 5,066,415 - Dany , et al. November 19, 1	1991-11-19
Process for the preparation of dicalcium phosphate Grant 5,024,825 - Buhl , et al. June 18, 1	1991-06-18
Tooth pastes, cleaning agent for tooth pastes based on dicalcium phosphate-dihydrate, and process for making such cleaning agent Grant 4,931,272 - Dany , et al. June 5, 1	1990-06-05
Particulate material reducing the ignitability of combustible substances Grant 4,514,328 - Staendeke , et al. April 30, 1	1985-04-30
Particulate agent for impeding the combustibility of combustible materials Grant 4,467,056 - Staendeke , et al. August 21, 1	1984-08-21
Particulate agent for impeding the combustibility of combustible substances Grant 4,347,334 - Staendeke , et al. August 31, 1	1982-08-31
Stabilized red phosphorus and process for its manufacture Grant 4,315,897 - Staendeke , et al. February 16, 1	1982-02-16
Additive for use in metal working Grant 4,268,404 - Ahlgrim , et al. May 19, 1	1981-05-19
Intumescent flame-retardant coating compositions Grant 4,166,743 - Wortmann , et al. September 4, 1	1979-09-04
Stabilized red phosphorus and process for making it Grant 4,115,522 - Staendeke , et al. September 19, 1	1978-09-19
Process for flameproofing plastics Grant 4,105,735 - Dany , et al. August 8, 1	1978-08-08
Process for imparting antistatic properties to rubber Grant 4,098,968 - Wortmann , et al. July 4, 1	1978-07-04
Flameproof polyurethanes Grant 4,097,400 - Wortmann , et al. June 27, 1	1978-06-27
Process for imparting antistatic properties to plastics Grant 4,097,656 - Dany , et al. June 27, 1	1978-06-27
Intumescent flame-retardant coating compositions Grant 4,009,137 - Dany , et al. February 22, 1	1977-02-22
Reducing flammability of polyurethane foams with phosphorus compounds Grant 3,998,764 - Vollmer , et al. December 21, 1	1976-12-21
Flameproof moulding compositions based on polyolefins Grant 3,931,101 - Dany , et al. January 6, 1	1976-01-06
Flameproof moulding compositions based on polyolefins Grant 3,931,081 - Dany , et al. January 6, 1	1976-01-06
Apparatus For The Manufacture Of Most Finely Pulverized Red Phosphorus Grant 3,731,882 - Muller , et al. May 8, 1	1973-05-08

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.