loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Daniel; S. Christopher.The latest application filed is for "less-invasive devices and methods for treatment of cardiac valves".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Less-invasive devices and methods for treatment of cardiac valves Grant 6,564,805 - Garrison , et al. May 20, 2 | 2003-05-20 |
Endoscopic retraction method Grant 6,558,318 - Daniel , et al. May 6, 2 | 2003-05-06 |
Less-invasive devices and methods for treatment of cardiac valves App 20020183839 - Garrison, Michi E. ;   et al. | 2002-12-05 |
Endoscopic retraction system and method App 20020068855 - Daniel, S. Christopher ;   et al. | 2002-06-06 |
Endoscopic retraction system and method App 20020062066 - Daniel, S. Christopher ;   et al. | 2002-05-23 |
Endoscopic retraction system and method App 20020062065 - Daniel, S. Christopher ;   et al. | 2002-05-23 |
Method for manipulating a tissue structure within a thoracic cavity Grant 5,980,455 - Daniel , et al. November 9, 1 | 1999-11-09 |
Less-invasive devices and methods for treatment of cardiac valves Grant 5,972,030 - Garrison , et al. October 26, 1 | 1999-10-26 |
Clamp assembly and method of use Grant 5,618,307 - Donlon , et al. April 8, 1 | 1997-04-08 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.