loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Dangel; Tim M..The latest application filed is for "piston and cylinder assembly with push rod retention".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Piston and cylinder assembly with push rod retention Grant 7,047,868 - Nolan , et al. May 23, 2 | 2006-05-23 |
Piston and cylinder assembly with push rod retention App 20050166753 - Nolan, Michael Joe ;   et al. | 2005-08-04 |
Elastomeric damper for hydraulic clutch actuator App 20040026208 - Nix, Richard A. ;   et al. | 2004-02-12 |
Master cylinder with extended piston Grant 6,550,246 - Barr , et al. April 22, 2 | 2003-04-22 |
Master cylinder with extended piston App 20030010028 - Barr, Paul L. ;   et al. | 2003-01-16 |
Master cylinder with improved piston guidance App 20030010027 - Dangel, Tim M. ;   et al. | 2003-01-16 |
Quick connector with snap-on frangible retainer Grant 5,863,077 - Szabo , et al. January 26, 1 | 1999-01-26 |
Quick connector with snap-on retainer Grant 5,730,481 - Szabo , et al. March 24, 1 | 1998-03-24 |
Snap fit lock with release feature Grant 5,577,779 - Dangel November 26, 1 | 1996-11-26 |
Wiring harness retainer clip Grant 5,494,245 - Suzuki , et al. February 27, 1 | 1996-02-27 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.