loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Dalton; Angela Beth.The latest application filed is for "detection of airflow anomalies in electronic equipment".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Detection of airflow anomalies in electronic equipment Grant 8,032,331 - Dalton , et al. October 4, 2 | 2011-10-04 |
Workload apportionment according to mean and variance Grant 7,930,573 - Bland , et al. April 19, 2 | 2011-04-19 |
Method of detecting recirculation of heated air within a rack enclosure Grant 7,925,389 - Bradicich , et al. April 12, 2 | 2011-04-12 |
Detection of Airflow Anomalies in Electronic Equipment App 20090138228 - Dalton; Angela Beth ;   et al. | 2009-05-28 |
Workload Apportionment According to Mean and Variance App 20090077398 - Bland; Patrick Maurice ;   et al. | 2009-03-19 |
Detection of airflow anomalies in electronic equipment Grant 7,421,368 - Dalton , et al. September 2, 2 | 2008-09-02 |
Detection Of Airflow Anomalies In Electronic Equipment App 20080147363 - Dalton; Angela Beth ;   et al. | 2008-06-19 |
A Method Of Detecting Recirculation Of Heated Air Within A Rack Enclosure App 20070291817 - Bradicich; Thomas Michael ;   et al. | 2007-12-20 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.