Trademark applications and grants for Daiso Co L T D. Daiso Co L T D has 3 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "EPICHLOMER"
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
MEDIUM ADDITIVE FOR CELL CULTURE 20160053028 - 14/780315 KIDO; Masahide ;   et al. | 2016-02-25 |
POSITIVE ELECTRODE AND NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SECONDARY BATTERY 20160006075 - 14/768562 TABUCHI; Masato ;   et al. | 2016-01-07 |
BINDER FOR BATTERY ELECTRODE, AND ELECTRODE AND BATTERY USING SAME 20150372305 - 14/762982 MATSUO; Takashi ;   et al. | 2015-12-24 |
ANODE FOR USE IN ZERO-GAP BRINE ELECTROLYZER, BRINE ELECTROLYZER AND METHOD FOR ZERO-GAP BRINE ELECTROLYSIS EMPLOYING SAME 20150299876 - 14/439653 Hara; Kanefusa ;   et al. | 2015-10-22 |
CARRIER FOR ANTIBODY PURIFICATION, MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR SAME, AND APPLICATION FOR SAME 20150152195 - 14/406728 Iwakura; Masahiro ;   et al. | 2015-06-04 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
![]() "EPICHLOMER" 2966219 78228346 |
EPICHLOMER 2003-03-21 |
![]() "DAISOGEL" 2700228 76431353 |
DAISOGEL 2002-07-15 |
![]() "DAISOPAK" 2711279 76431364 |
DAISOPAK 2002-07-15 |
NCAGE Code | 0MNY3 | DAISO CO LTD |
CAGE Code | 0MNY3 | DAISO CO LTD |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.