DAIKYO CHEMICAL CO., LTD.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for DAIKYO CHEMICAL CO., LTD..The latest application filed is for "flame retardant treatment of polyester based synthetic fiber structure".
- DAIKYO CHEMICAL CO., LTD. - Kyoto JP
- Daikyo Chemical Co., Ltd. - Kyoto-shi JP
- DAIKYO CHEMICAL CO., LTD. - SEIREN CO, LTD.
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Flame Retardant Treatment Of Polyester Based Synthetic Fiber Structure App 20200115527 - IWAKI; Terufumu ; et al. | 2020-04-16 |
| Flame-retardant metal-coated cloth Grant 8,043,983 - Iwaki , et al. October 25, 2 | 2011-10-25 |
| Artificial sueded leather being excellent in flame retardance and method of producing the same App 20090258182 - Okamoto; Keiji ; et al. | 2009-10-15 |
| Agent and method for flame-retardant processing of polyester-based fiber products Grant 7,588,802 - Iwaki , et al. September 15, 2 | 2009-09-15 |
| Flameproofing agent for polyester-based textile product and method of flameproofing Grant 7,425,352 - Iwaki , et al. September 16, 2 | 2008-09-16 |
| Flame-retardant metal-coated cloth App 20050159061 - Iwaki, Terufumi ; et al. | 2005-07-21 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 