Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Daikin Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha.The latest application filed is for "catalytic oxidation apparatus".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Catalytic oxidation apparatus Grant 4,418,046 - Izumo , et al. November 29, 1 | 1983-11-29 |
Refrigerant mixture Grant 4,309,296 - Enjo , et al. January 5, 1 | 1982-01-05 |
Process for removing water from surfaces of articles and water removing bath for use in the process Grant 4,307,518 - Izumo , et al. December 29, 1 | 1981-12-29 |
Modified tetrafluoroethylene polymer and process for producing same Grant 4,134,995 - Fumoto , et al. January 16, 1 | 1979-01-16 |
Dry cleaning composition Grant 4,124,517 - Hisamoto , et al. November 7, 1 | 1978-11-07 |
Process for preparing polytetrafluoroethylene fine powders Grant 4,098,975 - Shimizu , et al. July 4, 1 | 1978-07-04 |
Process for manufacturing polyfluoroalkyl propanols Grant 3,956,405 - Katsushima , et al. May 11, 1 | 1976-05-11 |
Hydroxypolyfluoroalkyl-containing silane derivatives and manufacturing the same Grant 3,944,587 - Katsushima , et al. March 16, 1 | 1976-03-16 |
Polyfluoroalkyl hydroxypropyl phosphates Grant 3,919,361 - Katsushima , et al. November 11, 1 | 1975-11-11 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.