loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Daigle; Robert V..The latest application filed is for "modular pallet with interlocking inserts".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Modular pallet with interlocking inserts Grant 5,887,529 - John , et al. March 30, 1 | 1999-03-30 |
Interlocking modular pallet apparatus and method of construction Grant 5,860,369 - John , et al. January 19, 1 | 1999-01-19 |
Vertical interlocking modular pallet apparatus and method of construction Grant 5,809,905 - John , et al. September 22, 1 | 1998-09-22 |
Modular pallet system Grant 5,794,543 - John , et al. August 18, 1 | 1998-08-18 |
Modular pallet system Grant 5,791,261 - John , et al. August 11, 1 | 1998-08-11 |
Line handling device for positioning and handling of mooring lines Grant 5,699,748 - Linskey, Jr. , et al. December 23, 1 | 1997-12-23 |
Modular conduit support Grant D331,189 - Daigle , et al. November 24, 1 | 1992-11-24 |
Conduit support Grant D323,106 - Daigle , et al. January 14, 1 | 1992-01-14 |
Constant pressure nozzle system Grant 4,964,574 - Daigle October 23, 1 | 1990-10-23 |
Infra-red security system Grant 4,751,396 - Daigle , et al. June 14, 1 | 1988-06-14 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.