Dai,Chaohui
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Dai,chaohui. Dai,chaohui has 2 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "PIXATA"
- Company Aliases
- Dai,Chaohui
- chaohui dai
- DAI; Chaohui - Shanghai CN
| Entity Type | INDIVIDUAL |
| Address | No.68 Daiwangzhuang Village, Fukan Township, Nanle County Puyang CHINA 457400 |
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| NKG2A ANTIBODY, PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR AND APPLICATION THEREOF 20220259306 - 17/292379 DUAN; Qing ; et al. | 2022-08-18 |
| FULLY HUMANIZED ANTI-GITR ANTIBODY AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR 20220119541 - 17/298381 QI; Qianqian ; et al. | 2022-04-21 |
| ANTI-HUMAN TIM-3 MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY AND APPLICATION THEREOF 20220033501 - 17/298817 SONG; Ningning ; et al. | 2022-02-03 |
| CD47 ANTIBODY, PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR AND USES THEREOF 20220017615 - 17/299368 LIU; Lile ; et al. | 2022-01-20 |
| ANTI-HUMAN INTERLEUKIN 5(IL-5) MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY AND USE THEREOF 20220010008 - 17/413045 YANG; Yizhen ; et al. | 2022-01-13 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"PIXATA" 90308217 |
PIXATA 2020-11-09 |
"PERCEA" 90300061 |
PERCEA 2020-11-05 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 