DAE HA CO., LTD.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for DAE HA CO., LTD..The latest application filed is for "glass wool cutting device and method for manufacturing glass wool pellet using the same".
- DAE HA CO., LTD. - Dangjin-si, Chungcheongnam-do N/A KR
- DAE HA Co., Ltd. - Chungcheongnam-do KR
- Dae Ha Co., Ltd. - Dangjin KR
- DAE HA CO., LTD. - Dangjin-si KR
- DAE HA CO., LTD. - Seoul KR
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Polypropylene composite resin composition having excellent scratch resistance and mechanical properties Grant 10,745,547 - Kim , et al. A | 2020-08-18 |
| Polypropylene resin composition and molded product thereof Grant 10,533,086 - Kim , et al. Ja | 2020-01-14 |
| Glass Wool Cutting Device And Method For Manufacturing Glass Wool Pellet Using The Same App 20190292091 - Lee; Han Ki ; et al. | 2019-09-26 |
| Polypropylene Composite Resin Composition Having Excellent Scratch Resistance And Mechanical Properties App 20190185652 - KIM; Hak Soo ; et al. | 2019-06-20 |
| Polypropylene Resin Composition And Molded Product Thereof App 20180258270 - KIM; Hyun Gyung ; et al. | 2018-09-13 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 