loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Dabney; William C..The latest application filed is for "tubular unit with vessel engaging cuff structure".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Tubular unit with vessel engaging cuff structure Grant 3,991,767 - Miller, Jr. , et al. November 16, 1 | 1976-11-16 |
Apparatus for controlled volume and rate administration of liquids Grant 3,965,895 - Dabney June 29, 1 | 1976-06-29 |
Pressurized gas driven vehicle and methods for charging and launching it Grant 3,950,889 - Dabney April 20, 1 | 1976-04-20 |
Plasmapheresis assembly Grant 3,945,380 - Dabney , et al. March 23, 1 | 1976-03-23 |
Tubular Unit With Vessel Engaging Cuff Structure Grant 3,889,685 - Miller, Jr. , et al. June 17, 1 | 1975-06-17 |
Apparatus For Aseptically Dispensing A Measured Volume Of Liquid Grant 3,844,283 - Dabney October 29, 1 | 1974-10-29 |
Flow Control Apparatus Grant 3,802,463 - Dabney April 9, 1 | 1974-04-09 |
Apparatus For Intravenous Administration Of A Fluid From A Dual-chamber Flask Having An Internal Upset-table Septum Normally Separating Two Axially-in-line Chambers And Having A Pierceable End Stopper Grant 3,670,728 - Dabney June 20, 1 | 1972-06-20 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.