Trademark applications and grants for Curon Medical Inc. Curon Medical Inc has 1 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "BOWEL INCONTINENCE"
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
Apparatus to treat esophageal sphincters 20110098702 - 12/927354 Edwards; Stuart D. ;   et al. | 2011-04-28 |
Systems and methods for monitoring and controlling use of medical devices 20110098698 - 12/927353 Bek; Robin ;   et al. | 2011-04-28 |
Systems and methods for treating tissue regions of the body 20090043302 - 12/287404 Ford; John H. ;   et al. | 2009-02-12 |
Systems and methods employing a bite block insert for positioning and stabilizing external instruments deployed within the body 20080306447 - 12/221850 West; Scott ;   et al. | 2008-12-11 |
Systems and methods for treating dysfunctions in the intestines and rectum that adapt to the anatomic form and structure of different individuals 20080103498 - 12/004189 West; Scott H. ;   et al. | 2008-05-01 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
![]() "BOWEL INCONTINENCE" 78584797 |
BOWEL INCONTINENCE 2005-03-10 |
SEC | 0001114365 | CURON MEDICAL INC of DELAWARE |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.