Cumbers; Blake
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Cumbers; Blake.The latest application filed is for "passive biometric customer identification and tracking system".
- Cumbers; Blake - Henderson NV
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Passive biometric customer identification and tracking system Grant 7,357,717 - Cumbers April 15, 2 | 2008-04-15 |
| Apparatus and method for controlling and preventing compulsive gaming Grant 7,288,025 - Cumbers October 30, 2 | 2007-10-30 |
| Passive biometric customer identification and tracking system Grant 7,175,528 - Cumbers February 13, 2 | 2007-02-13 |
| Passive biometric customer identification and tracking system Grant 6,783,459 - Cumbers August 31, 2 | 2004-08-31 |
| Passive biometric customer identification and tracking system Grant 6,554,705 - Cumbers April 29, 2 | 2003-04-29 |
| Passive biometric customer identification and tracking system App 20020132663 - Cumbers, Blake | 2002-09-19 |
| Player tracking and identification system Grant 6,234,900 - Cumbers May 22, 2 | 2001-05-22 |
| Player tracking and identification system Grant 6,142,876 - Cumbers November 7, 2 | 2000-11-07 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 