Cullen James P
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Cullen James P. Cullen James P has 1 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "MR. BLIND REPAIR"
- Company Aliases
- Cullen, James P
- p james cullen
- Cullen, James P. - Bartonsville PA
- Cullen; James P. - Bartonsville PA
- Cullen; James P. - Baltimore MD
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| Proliferous copolymer of vinyl pyrrolidone and vinyl acetate 20040054066 - 10/663565 Malawer, Edward G. ; et al. | 2004-03-18 |
| PROLIFEROUS COPOLYMER OF VINYL PYRROLIDONE AND VINYL ACETATE 20030153705 - 10/071753 Malawer, Edward G. ; et al. | 2003-08-14 |
| Proliferous copolymer of vinyl pyrrolidone and vinyl acetate 6,806,334 - 10/663,565 Malawer , et al. October 19, 2 | 2004-10-19 |
| Proliferous copolymer of vinyl pyrrolidone and vinyl acetate 6,620,900 - 10/071,753 Malawer , et al. September 16, 2 | 2003-09-16 |
| Hand-held bowling data processor 4,974,161 - 07/079,064 Cullen November 27, 1 | 1990-11-27 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"MR. BLIND REPAIR" 86610926 |
MR. BLIND REPAIR 2015-04-27 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 