loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Cryogenic Group, Inc..The latest application filed is for "process and system to produce multiple distributable products from source, or imported lng".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Magnetic oxygen concentrator for air streams Grant 7,771,509 - Brown August 10, 2 | 2010-08-10 |
Process and system to produce multiple distributable products from source, or imported LNG Grant 7,603,867 - Brown October 20, 2 | 2009-10-20 |
Process and system to produce multiple distributable products from source, or imported LNG App 20080060380 - Brown; Ross M. | 2008-03-13 |
Anti-weathering apparatus method for liquid and vapor storage systems Grant 7,201,002 - Brown April 10, 2 | 2007-04-10 |
Process and apparatus for LNG enriching in methane Grant 6,986,266 - Narinsky January 17, 2 | 2006-01-17 |
Air cycle pre-cooling system for air separation unit Grant 6,925,818 - Brown August 9, 2 | 2005-08-09 |
Cryogenic pump Grant 5,575,626 - Brown , et al. November 19, 1 | 1996-11-19 |
Cryogenic pump Grant 5,511,955 - Brown , et al. April 30, 1 | 1996-04-30 |
Valve position indicator Grant 5,137,052 - Baumgart August 11, 1 | 1992-08-11 |
SEC | 0000878455 | CRYOGENIC GROUP INC |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.