Cruickshank; Kenneth A.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Cruickshank; Kenneth A..The latest application filed is for "template-directed photoligation".
- Cruickshank; Kenneth A. - Naperville IL
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Template-directed photoligation Grant 6,306,587 - Royer , et al. October 23, 2 | 2001-10-23 |
| Template-directed ligation and amplification assay Grant 5,686,243 - Royer , et al. November 11, 1 | 1997-11-11 |
| Methods and compounds for labeling DNA with xanthine and lower alkyl substituted xanthine derivatives and reagents for the in situ detection of chromosomes Grant 5,512,433 - Cruickshank , et al. April 30, 1 | 1996-04-30 |
| Production of chromosome region specific DNA sequences and transamination Grant 5,506,350 - Bittner , et al. April 9, 1 | 1996-04-09 |
| Template-directed photoligation Grant 5,449,602 - Royer , et al. September 12, 1 | 1995-09-12 |
| Diagnostic reagents made by attaching cytidine containing nucleic acid probes to amino functionalized solid supports by bisulfite mediated transamination Grant 5,082,935 - Cruickshank January 21, 1 | 1992-01-21 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 