Crown Sterling L T D L L C
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Crown Sterling L T D L L C. Crown Sterling L T D L L C has 35 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "MAYA"
- Company Aliases
- CROWN STERLING LIMITED LLC
- Crown Sterling Limited, LLC - Newport Beach CA US
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| Use Of Irrational Number Sequences To Secure State Transition Function In Blockchain Transactions 20220224524 - 17/705553 Grant; Robert Edward | 2022-07-14 |
| HOMOMORPHIC ONE-TIME PAD ENCRYPTION 20220200785 - 17/132128 Grant; Robert Edward ; et al. | 2022-06-23 |
| METHODS OF PROVIDING PRECISE TUNING OF MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS 20220199058 - 17/132374 Grant; Robert Edward | 2022-06-23 |
| Decryption of Encrypted Data Missing a Private Key 20220166618 - 17/103743 Grant; Robert Edward | 2022-05-26 |
| Methods of Storing and Distributing Large Keys 20220085988 - 17/018582 Grant; Robert Edward | 2022-03-17 |
| NCAGE Code | 891S1 | CROWN STERLING LIMITED, LLC |
| CAGE Code | 891S1 | CROWN STERLING LIMITED, LLC |
| S.A.M. Registration | 891S1 [116983894] | CROWN STERLING LIMITED, LLC |
| DUNS | 116983894 | Crown Sterling Limited, LLC |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 