Crowder; Harold Lloyd
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Crowder; Harold Lloyd.The latest application filed is for "three-member prosthetic joint".
- Crowder; Harold Lloyd - Concord NC
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Three-member prosthetic joint Grant 9,566,157 - Kellar , et al. February 14, 2 | 2017-02-14 |
| Three-member Prosthetic Joint App 20140046450 - Kellar; Franz W. ; et al. | 2014-02-13 |
| Prosthetic knee joint Grant 8,512,413 - Kellar , et al. August 20, 2 | 2013-08-20 |
| Prosthetic Ball-and-socket Joint App 20120083896 - Kellar; Franz W. ; et al. | 2012-04-05 |
| Prosthetic ball-and-socket joint Grant 8,070,823 - Kellar , et al. December 6, 2 | 2011-12-06 |
| Prosthetic knee joint Grant 8,029,574 - Kellar , et al. October 4, 2 | 2011-10-04 |
| Prosthetic Ball-and-socket Joint App 20110166667 - Kellar; Franz W. ; et al. | 2011-07-07 |
| Prosthetic Joint App 20110166671 - Kellar; Franz W. ; et al. | 2011-07-07 |
| Prosthetic joint Grant 7,905,919 - Kellar , et al. March 15, 2 | 2011-03-15 |
| Prosthetic joint App 20100280623 - Kellar; Franz W. ; et al. | 2010-11-04 |
| Prosthetic joint App 20100161064 - Kellar; Franz W. ; et al. | 2010-06-24 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 