loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Crippen; Richard E..The latest application filed is for "low current voltage supply circuit for an lcd driver".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Low current voltage supply circuit for an LCD driver Grant 6,118,439 - Ho , et al. September 12, 2 | 2000-09-12 |
Non-volatile memory control and data loading architecture for multiple chip processor Grant 5,623,686 - Hall , et al. April 22, 1 | 1997-04-22 |
Multiple chip package processor having feed through paths on one die Grant 5,606,710 - Hall , et al. February 25, 1 | 1997-02-25 |
Multiple chip processor architecture with memory interface control register for in-system programming Grant 5,581,779 - Hall , et al. December 3, 1 | 1996-12-03 |
In-system programming architecture for a multiple chip processor Grant 5,566,344 - Hall , et al. October 15, 1 | 1996-10-15 |
Integrated injection logic with heavily doped injector base self-aligned with injector emitter and collector Grant 4,115,797 - Hingarh , et al. September 19, 1 | 1978-09-19 |
Graduated multiple collector structure for inverted vertical bipolar transistors Grant 4,084,174 - Crippen , et al. April 11, 1 | 1978-04-11 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.