Courtaulds Aerospace, Inc.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Courtaulds Aerospace, Inc..The latest application filed is for "chromate-free, one-part, non-curing corrosion inhibitive sealant with resistance to aviation fuel".
- Courtaulds Aerospace, Inc. - Glendale CA
- Courtaulds Aerospace, Inc. - Burbank CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Chromate-free, one-part, non-curing corrosion inhibitive sealant with resistance to aviation fuel Grant 6,069,211 - Reyes, Jr. , et al. May 30, 2 | 2000-05-30 |
| Composition and method for producing polythioethers having pendent methyl chains Grant 5,959,071 - DeMoss , et al. September 28, 1 | 1999-09-28 |
| Dispensing cartridge Grant 5,680,967 - Dang , et al. October 28, 1 | 1997-10-28 |
| Combination closure and syringe Grant 5,531,710 - Dang , et al. July 2, 1 | 1996-07-02 |
| Low viscosity polythiol and method therefor Grant 5,225,472 - Cameron , et al. July 6, 1 | 1993-07-06 |
| NCAGE Code | 0NYS9 | COURTAULDS AEROSPACE INC |
| NCAGE Code | 0U1D9 | COURTAULDS AEROSPACE INC |
| CAGE Code | 0NYS9 | COURTAULDS AEROSPACE INC |
| CAGE Code | 0U1D9 | COURTAULDS AEROSPACE INC |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 