loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Correia; James.The latest application filed is for "source wire for radiation treatment".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Source wire for radiation treatment Grant 6,508,754 - Liprie , et al. January 21, 2 | 2003-01-21 |
Afterloader apparatus Grant 6,350,227 - Shikhman , et al. February 26, 2 | 2002-02-26 |
Laser ablation device Grant 6,283,955 - Pacala , et al. September 4, 2 | 2001-09-04 |
Laser ablation device Grant 6,280,437 - Pacala , et al. August 28, 2 | 2001-08-28 |
Controlled advancement lasing device Grant 6,135,996 - Kolesa , et al. October 24, 2 | 2000-10-24 |
Coring device and method Grant 5,980,545 - Pacala , et al. November 9, 1 | 1999-11-09 |
Method and apparatus for transmyocardial revascularization Grant 5,947,989 - Shikhman , et al. September 7, 1 | 1999-09-07 |
Valve system for cannula assembly Grant 5,895,377 - Smith , et al. April 20, 1 | 1999-04-20 |
Fluid flow control apparatus for surgical cannulae Grant 5,865,812 - Correia February 2, 1 | 1999-02-02 |
Lasing device Grant 5,807,383 - Kolesa , et al. September 15, 1 | 1998-09-15 |
Valve system for cannula assembly Grant 5,603,702 - Smith , et al. February 18, 1 | 1997-02-18 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.