loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Cordis Leads, Inc..The latest application filed is for "endocardial lead with projections having saw tooth formation".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Endocardial lead with projections having saw tooth formation Grant 4,841,971 - Hess June 27, 1 | 1989-06-27 |
Apparatus for controlling pacing of a heart in response to changes in stroke volume Grant 4,802,481 - Schroeppel February 7, 1 | 1989-02-07 |
Pacing lead stylet Grant 4,796,642 - Harris January 10, 1 | 1989-01-10 |
Lead locking mechanism for cardiac pacers Grant 4,784,141 - Peers-Trevarton November 15, 1 | 1988-11-15 |
Lead assembly with selectable electrode connection Grant 4,744,370 - Harris May 17, 1 | 1988-05-17 |
Multi-conductor lead assembly for temporary use Grant 4,744,371 - Harris May 17, 1 | 1988-05-17 |
Pervenous electrical pacing lead with foldable fins Grant 4,721,118 - Harris January 26, 1 | 1988-01-26 |
A pacer including a multiple connector assembly with removable wedge and method of use Grant 4,712,557 - Harris Dec | 1987-12-15 |
Method for controlling pacing of a heart in response to changes in stroke volume Grant 4,708,143 - Schroeppel November 24, 1 | 1987-11-24 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.