Contractor; Sunil
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Contractor; Sunil.The latest application filed is for "systems and methods for per use message delivery".
- Contractor; Sunil - Marietta GA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Location visit detail services for wireless devices Grant 7,809,378 - Contractor October 5, 2 | 2010-10-05 |
| Systems and methods for per use busy message Grant 6,931,107 - Contractor August 16, 2 | 2005-08-16 |
| Systems and methods for per use no-answer message Grant 6,862,345 - Contractor March 1, 2 | 2005-03-01 |
| Systems and methods for no-answer redial and connect Grant 6,754,324 - Contractor June 22, 2 | 2004-06-22 |
| Systems and methods for per use message delivery Grant 6,711,240 - Contractor March 23, 2 | 2004-03-23 |
| Systems and methods for per use message delivery App 20020136366 - Contractor, Sunil | 2002-09-26 |
| Systems and methods for per use no-answer message App 20020101964 - Contractor, Sunil | 2002-08-01 |
| Systems and methods for per use busy message App 20020101963 - Contractor, Sunil | 2002-08-01 |
| Systems and methods for no-answer redial and connect App 20020101970 - Contractor, Sunil | 2002-08-01 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 