loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Construction Robotics, LLC.The latest application filed is for "intuitive control of lifting equipment".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Intuitive Control of Lifting Equipment App 20210154833 - Peters; Scott Lawrence ;   et al. | 2021-05-27 |
Building Element Lift Enhancer App 20200369494 - Peters; Scott Lawrence ;   et al. | 2020-11-26 |
Mortar delivery system Grant 10,759,087 - Peters , et al. Sep | 2020-09-01 |
Laser positioning system Grant 10,240,949 - Peters , et al. | 2019-03-26 |
Brick Laying System App 20170254102 - Peters; Scott Lawrence ;   et al. | 2017-09-07 |
Mortar Delivery System App 20170066157 - PETERS; Scott Lawrence ;   et al. | 2017-03-09 |
Laser Positioning System App 20160223364 - Peters; Scott Lawrence ;   et al. | 2016-08-04 |
Brick Laying System App 20150082740 - Peters; Scott Lawrence ;   et al. | 2015-03-26 |
Brick laying system Grant 8,965,571 - Peters , et al. February 24, 2 | 2015-02-24 |
CAGE Code | 5ZJK6 | CONSTRUCTION ROBOTICS, LLC CONSTRUCTION ROBOTICS |
S.A.M. Registration | 5ZJK6 [962286162] | CONSTRUCTION ROBOTICS, LLC |
SEC | 0001637532 | Construction Robotics, LLC of NEW YORK |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.