Connolly; Timothy
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Connolly; Timothy.The latest application filed is for "genes involved in osteogenesis, and methods of use".
- Connolly; Timothy - Westwood MA
- Connolly; Timothy - Belmont MA
- Connolly; Timothy - Franklin MA
- Connolly; Timothy - Norwood MA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Genes involved in osteogenesis, and methods of use App 20060030541 - Garcia; Teresa ; et al. | 2006-02-09 |
| Genes involved in osteogenesis, and methods of use App 20040265808 - Garcia, Teresa ; et al. | 2004-12-30 |
| Microarray-based subtractive hybridzation Grant 6,638,717 - Perrin , et al. October 28, 2 | 2003-10-28 |
| Human slit polypeptide and polynucleotides encoding same App 20020123104 - Connolly, Timothy ; et al. | 2002-09-05 |
| Human Hox C10 and polynucleotides encoding App 20020090694 - Connolly, Timothy | 2002-07-11 |
| Wet-laid nonwoven nylon battery separator material Grant 5,935,884 - Williams , et al. August 10, 1 | 1999-08-10 |
| Apparatus for producing symmetrical fluid entangled non-woven fabrics and related method Grant 4,960,630 - Greenway , et al. October 2, 1 | 1990-10-02 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 