loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Condon; Gary J..The latest application filed is for "wear-resistant anvil and impact rock crusher machine using such wear-resistant anvil".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Wear-resistant anvil and impact rock crusher machine using such wear-resistant anvil App 20070007376 - Condon; Gary J. ;   et al. | 2007-01-11 |
Invertible center feed disk for a vertical shaft impact crusher Grant 7,090,159 - Condon , et al. August 15, 2 | 2006-08-15 |
Wear bars for impellers Grant 7,028,936 - Condon April 18, 2 | 2006-04-18 |
Invertible center feed disk for a vertical shaft impact crusher App 20050211810 - Condon, Gary J. ;   et al. | 2005-09-29 |
Ring for concrete pump Grant 6,857,861 - Condon , et al. February 22, 2 | 2005-02-22 |
Wear bars for impellers App 20040251358 - Condon, Gary J. | 2004-12-16 |
Crusher wear components App 20030213861 - Condon, Gary J. ;   et al. | 2003-11-20 |
Ring for concrete pump App 20030215344 - Condon, Gary J. ;   et al. | 2003-11-20 |
Roll crusher teeth having hard compact material inserts App 20030146318 - Condon, Gary J. | 2003-08-07 |
Drill bit, hard member, and bit body Grant 6,595,305 - Dunn , et al. July 22, 2 | 2003-07-22 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.