loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Completion Tool Company.The latest application filed is for "progressively inflated packers".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Progressively inflated packers Grant 4,967,846 - Wood November 6, 1 | 1990-11-06 |
Method of producing progressively inflated packers Grant 4,897,139 - Wood January 30, 1 | 1990-01-30 |
Inflatable packer with roughened mandrel Grant 4,871,179 - Bell , et al. October 3, 1 | 1989-10-03 |
Progressively inflated packers Grant 4,781,249 - Wood November 1, 1 | 1988-11-01 |
Inflatable packer systems Grant 4,744,421 - Wood , et al. May 17, 1 | 1988-05-17 |
Packer valve arrangement Grant RE32,345 - Wood February 3, 1 | 1987-02-03 |
Pipe configuration compatible with CBL Grant 4,607,698 - Wood August 26, 1 | 1986-08-26 |
Method for determining true fracture pressure Grant 4,577,689 - Dotson March 25, 1 | 1986-03-25 |
Sequential inflatable packer Grant 4,577,695 - Wood March 25, 1 | 1986-03-25 |
Packer valve arrangement Grant 4,527,625 - Wood , et al. July 9, 1 | 1985-07-09 |
Packer valve arrangement Grant 4,420,159 - Wood December 13, 1 | 1983-12-13 |
Well packer valve arrangement Grant 4,402,517 - Wood , et al. September 6, 1 | 1983-09-06 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.