COMPASSIONATE ANALYTICS INC.
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Compassionate Analytics Inc.. Compassionate Analytics Inc. has 2 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "COMPASSIONATE ANALYTICS"
- Company Aliases
- COMPASSIONATE ANALYTICS INC.
- Compassionate Analytics Inc. - Victoria CA
- COMPASSIONATE ANALYTICS INC. - Victoria CA
| State Incorporated | CANADA |
| Entity Type | CORPORATION |
| Address | 3929 Rowley Rd. Victoria, BC CANADA V8N4C3 |
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| METHODS FOR CANNABINOID QUANTIFICATION 20200292564 - 16/825570 Lucas; Philippe ; et al. | 2020-09-17 |
| METHODS FOR CANNABINOID QUANTIFICATION 20180128843 - 15/863506 Lucas; Philippe ; et al. | 2018-05-10 |
| METHODS FOR CANNABINOID QUANTIFICATION 20170234897 - 15/587162 Lucas; Philippe ; et al. | 2017-08-17 |
| METHODS FOR CANNABINOID QUANTIFICATION 20160018424 - 14/771592 Lucas; Philippe ; et al. | 2016-01-21 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"COMPASSIONATE ANALYTICS" 97499338 |
COMPASSIONATE ANALYTICS 2022-07-12 |
"PLANTCHEK" 97497631 |
PLANTCHEK 2022-07-11 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 