Trademark applications and grants for Compagnie Industrielle Des Telecommunications Cit Alcatel. Compagnie Industrielle Des Telecommunications Cit Alcatel has 5 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "E 10 FIVE"
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
Method and device for selecting one station from a set of stations dialoging with a main station 4,713,805 - 06/652,390 Henaff December 15, 1 | 1987-12-15 |
Digital satellite exchange 4,689,783 - 06/638,137 kaczerowski August 25, 1 | 1987-08-25 |
Digital trunk adapter terminal unit 4,685,100 - 06/743,844 Coppens , et al. August 4, 1 | 1987-08-04 |
Synchronous data transmission method and device implementing same 4,682,334 - 06/736,038 Le Mouel , et al. July 21, 1 | 1987-07-21 |
Inverse discrete cosine transform calculation processor 4,679,163 - 06/709,857 Arnould , et al. July 7, 1 | 1987-07-07 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
![]() "E 10 FIVE" 1404642 73463920 |
E 10 FIVE 1984-02-03 |
![]() "RONEO" 1390558 73463156 |
RONEO 1984-01-30 |
![]() "CITEFAX" 1041087 72430206 |
CITEFAX 1972-07-18 |
![]() "VISIODIS" 1032607 72423874 |
VISIODIS 1972-05-10 |
![]() "SPAC" 1004493 81004493 |
SPAC 0000-00-00 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.