loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for COMOTEC.The latest application filed is for "high-amplitude elastic hinge element for eyeglass frame".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
High-amplitude Elastic Hinge Element For Eyeglass Frame App 20100091237 - Medana; Guido | 2010-04-15 |
Compact elastic hinge for a spectacle frame Grant 7,572,005 - Hotellier August 11, 2 | 2009-08-11 |
Compact Elastic Hinge For A Spectacle Frame App 20080192199 - Hotellier; Christophe | 2008-08-14 |
Compact elastic hinge element for a spectacle frame Grant 7,350,271 - Genelot April 1, 2 | 2008-04-01 |
Casing for spectacle frame hinge Grant D552,666 - Genelot October 9, 2 | 2007-10-09 |
Compact Elastic Hinge Element For A Spectacle Frame App 20070089268 - Genelot; Nicolas | 2007-04-26 |
Nosepieces for spectacle frames Grant D529,067 - Jost September 26, 2 | 2006-09-26 |
Casing for spectacle frame hinge Grant D525,281 - Genelot July 18, 2 | 2006-07-18 |
Elastic hinge having a radial stop against excessive opening Grant 6,916,093 - Quehin July 12, 2 | 2005-07-12 |
Elastic hinge having a radial stop against excessive opening App 20050078272 - Quehin, Sebastien Claude | 2005-04-14 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.