Coley; Kenneth R.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Coley; Kenneth R..The latest application filed is for "tennis racket".
- Coley; Kenneth R. - Fairfield CT US
- Coley; Kenneth R. - Stratford CT
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Tennis racket Grant 9,132,322 - Coley September 15, 2 | 2015-09-15 |
| Circuit breaker interlocking mechanism Grant 4,270,031 - Borona , et al. May 26, 1 | 1981-05-26 |
| Ground fault circuit breaker Grant 4,081,852 - Coley , et al. March 28, 1 | 1978-03-28 |
| Multi-pole ground fault circuit breaker Grant 3,999,103 - Misencik , et al. December 21, 1 | 1976-12-21 |
| Outdoor electrical enclosure Grant 3,955,709 - Coley , et al. May 11, 1 | 1976-05-11 |
| Panelboard With Insulative Snap-in Support Means Grant 3,769,553 - Coley October 30, 1 | 1973-10-30 |
| Dielectric Housing For Electrical Conductors In A Meter Housing Grant 3,746,936 - Coffey , et al. July 17, 1 | 1973-07-17 |
| Bus Bar Interconnection Arrangement For Stackable Electrical Panels Grant 3,707,652 - Coffey , et al. December 26, 1 | 1972-12-26 |
| Front Cover Assembly For Electrical Panels Grant 3,707,653 - Coffey , et al. December 26, 1 | 1972-12-26 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 